Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Accused Finish Arguments in Delhi Riots Bail Appeals as Police Reply Set for Nov. 10

Defence frames protest activity as lawful dissent while questioning a UAPA case anchored in protected witnesses.

Overview

  • Justices Aravind Kumar and N. V. Anjaria heard bail appeals from Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima, Meeran Haider, Shadab Ahmed, and Mohd. Saleem Khan.
  • Counsels said there is no material linking the appellants to violence or incitement, stressing prolonged incarceration and delay, including notification of investigation completion only on September 4, 2024.
  • For Shadab Ahmed, the defence noted his addition in a second supplementary chargesheet and challenged reliance on protected witnesses codenamed Radium and Sodium, a barely recognisable photograph, and police depositions.
  • The Delhi Police maintains the riots were the result of a premeditated larger conspiracy, citing an FIR under the IPC and UAPA and attributing 53 deaths and hundreds of injuries to the 2020 violence.
  • The appeals challenge the Delhi High Court’s September 2 bail denials, with the Supreme Court now set to hear the police response on Monday.