Particle.news

Download on the App Store

8th Circuit Blocks Private Voting Rights Act Enforcement in Seven States

The appeals court reversed a ruling favoring Native American tribes in North Dakota, deepening legal divides and setting the stage for potential Supreme Court review.

FILE -North Dakota Republican Secretary of State Michael Howe stands in Memorial Hall of the state Capitol in Bismarck, N.D., on Sept. 29, 2023. (AP Photo/Jack Dura, File)
FILE - Sunlight illuminates the exterior of the North Dakota House of Representatives and the state Capitol tower in Bismarck, N.D., on Nov. 10, 2023. (AP Photo/Jack Dura, File)
North Dakota Republican Senate Majority Leader David Hogue, of Minot, is seen Friday, May 2, 2025, before a bill signing in Memorial Hall of the state Capitol in Bismarck, N.D. (AP Photo/Jack Dura)
Activists hold a pro-voting rights placards outside of the US Supreme Court on February 27, 2013 in Washington, DC as the Court prepares to hear Shelby County vs Holder.

Overview

  • The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that private individuals cannot use Section 1983 to enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, limiting options for challenging racial discrimination in voting.
  • The decision reversed a federal court ruling that North Dakota’s 2021 redistricting map unlawfully diluted Native American votes, leaving the map in place for the 2026 elections.
  • The ruling affects seven states in the 8th Circuit—Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota—restricting private lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act in these states.
  • The decision creates a split among federal appeals courts on private enforcement of voting rights, increasing the likelihood of U.S. Supreme Court involvement to resolve the conflict.
  • Civil rights advocates warn the ruling undermines decades of voting rights protections, with plaintiffs considering en banc appeals or seeking Supreme Court review.