Overview
- Attorneys general filed the case in federal court in Eugene, Oregon, seeking to vacate and enjoin USDA’s Oct. 31 guidance.
- States argue USDA wrongly lists refugees, asylees and humanitarian parolees as “not eligible” for SNAP even after they become lawful permanent residents.
- Plaintiffs contend USDA improperly treated Nov. 1 as the effective date, eliminating the customary 120‑day period for states to update systems and notify recipients.
- The coalition warns of steep fiscal penalties tied to error rates and says thousands could be cut off, including about 35,000 permanent residents in New York.
- The challenge follows a shutdown that briefly paused November payments and coincides with new OBBBA work rules projected by CBO to trim average monthly SNAP enrollment by about 2.4 million, with CBPP estimating large state‑level losses.